🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.